The law also defines harm, which includes severe emotional distress. Watch popular content from the following creators: BBC Radio 1(bbcradio1). The Court may consider the following factors: the language used, the age and characteristics of the victim, the anonymous nature or not of the message, the repetitive nature of the message, the circulation of the message, the number of people who have seen and the context in which the message appeared. Discover short videos related to radio1 online hallgats ingyen on TikTok. “With the 2021 amendments, the laws have also clarified the contexts in which it can be said that a person has annoyed another. The lawyer explains that this does not mean that guilt is automatically determined. Posting or sharing such videos may lead to legal action. If the story is private, someone has decided to make it public and there are legal repercussions…Įven if the famous law passed in 2018 which spoke of causing annoyance has been repealed, it is now necessary to prove that the video harms any person, according to Me Shameer Hussenboccus. What that means exactly is not stated in the draft.Social networks have been on fire since Tuesday because of a video posted online concerning alleged infidelity. If changed, TV producers whose productions were funded by RBB would no longer receive license fees when their production is then broadcast by RBB or added to its library.Īnd complaints against programming would only be accepted under the proposed guidelines "if concrete reasons are given". A statement from RBB managers, quoting a paper from the Berlin government, welcomes the change.Ĭurrently, RBB can only add a production it subsidized to its library if it agrees to sign a license agreement for that production. RBB could also save money by making a minor linguistic change to part of the contract that would say it could only subsidize productions such as films if it wins concessions from the production. The country's network of public broadcasters failed to win an increase in the mandatory monthly fee earlier this year, putting immense pressure on broadcasters to reel in their budgets. If there is a reasonable fear that online-only radio would attract fewer listeners, they couldn't become internet-only.īut there is likely to be pressure to move RBB online on a larger scale than today. The Rundfunkrat, or advisory board, would have to approve it and the broadcaster would have to prove that the stations would have the same impact without being broadcast on the airwaves. However, RBB can't just shove its radio stations' programmes over onto the Internet. Only RBB 88.8 and Antenne Brandenburg would be guaranteed a spot on the FM dial. Paragraph 2.4 has five of its seven radio stations "broadcast exclusively via the internet or replaced by comparable services on the internet". The changes proposed in Section 4, which regulates the distribution of RBB stations on the airwaves, are remarkable. Politicians in Berlin and Brandenburg say the shifts in the media world require touching up the agreement, but the relatively small piece of legislation has some deep cuts. The agreement also predated the 2014 ZDF ruling by the country's top court that limited government influence in public broadcasters by capping the number of politicians on advisory panels. At the time, Netflix and Amazon Prime Video didn't exist in Germany and Spotify was just a niche provider with 30 million users worldwide – it now has 345 million.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |